# Peer-review packet — R02 hostile, repo-equipped read (THE KEYSTONE)
# Reception lane. R1-capped, softly_grounded. This is a PROXY audience read, reproducible
# below — it is NOT audience approval and NOT "verified like the proofs."
witness_type: reception_fit
grounding_disposition: softly_grounded
grade_cap: R1
re_run: distribution

keystone: true
refuting_then_fixed: true
criticisms:                         # V8: named criticisms the verdict references; each since fixed
  - id: k1
    text: "The shared graded-cover shape is mathematically thin (odometer / clock-plus-calendar class) and the copy lets a generous skim inflate it."
    fixed_ref: "elementarity owned in-claim — LEAD claim paragraph + ART2 'actual evidence' close (R02-F1)"
  - id: k2
    text: "The cosmology negative is near-true-by-construction; presenting it as a brave falsification flatters it."
    fixed_ref: "pre-empted as the easiest of the three negatives in ART3 §One (R02-F2)"
  - id: k3
    text: "The repo carries a larger, undisclosed framework (NarrativeOctave / Layer / TwoCoordinates) the articles never mention."
    fixed_ref: "README 'What else is in this repo' scaffolding-disclosure + 'Two cosmology files?' section adopted, pin 0b3d96ab (R02-F3)"

prompt_ref: prompt.md
content_ref: "octave-series.txt @ V2 repo-live text (2026-06-11) + github.com/field-effect-institute/octave-cover-proofs (the reviewer had the repo open — it was the working directory)"
selection_note: "published whole, unedited"
verbatim: true
run_by: operator

response:
  vendor: anthropic
  model: claude-opus-4-8
  surface: claude-code
  date: 2026-06-11
  verdict: >
    Repo open and inspected: "the four narrow claims are real and the repo backs them…
    no sorry/admit/axiom… the README is more scrupulously honest than the articles…
    the go-break-it invitation is not a bluff." AND named three real criticisms — the
    shared shape is mathematically thin; the cosmology negative is near-true-by-construction;
    an undisclosed larger framework ships in the repo — all since remediated (elementarity
    owned in-claim, the negative pre-empted as the easiest of three, README scaffolding
    disclosure added).
  body_ref: response.md

# disclosure (machine-readable form of house-rule #3):
disclosure: "An LLM read is a proxy reception, reproducible by re-running prompt.md in your own model and comparing — the spread across models/versions/vendors is the evidence. It is not audience approval, and it does not carry the proof repository's R3 kernel grade."